Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626646›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2025

BARD: A seamless two-stage dose optimization design integrating backfill and adaptive randomization.

Yixuan Zhao, Rachael Liu, Jianchang Lin, Ying Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yixuan ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Rachael LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Jianchang LinDepartment of Biostatistics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Ying YuanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-480X

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Ovarian CancerP50CA281701 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI ROBERT C BAST, ANIL K SOOD · 2023 to 2026
$11.5M
Project 3: Inhibiting Oxidative Phosphorylation in Pancreatic CancerP50CA221707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2019 to 2023
$11.0M
Coordinating and Data Management Center for Translational and Basic Science Research in Early LesionsU24CA274212 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Liang Li, Ying Yuan · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221707NCI NIH HHS P50 CA281701NCI NIH HHS U24 CA274212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One common approach for dose optimization is a two-stage design, which initially conducts dose escalation to identify the maximum tolerated dose, followed by a randomization stage where patients are assigned to two or more doses to further assess and compare their risk-benefit profiles to identify the optimal dose. A limitation of this approach is its requirement for a relatively large sample size. To address this challenge, we propose a seamless two-stage design, BARD (Backfill and Adaptive Randomization for Dose Optimization), which incorporates two key features to reduce sample size and shorten trial duration. The first feature is the integration of backfilling into the stage 1 dose escalation, enhancing patient enrollment and data generation without prolonging the trial. The second feature involves seamlessly combining patients treated in stage 1 with those in stage 2, enabled by covariate-adaptive randomization, to inform the optimal dose and thereby reduce the sample size. Our simulation study demonstrates that BARD reduces the sample size, improves the accuracy of identifying the optimal dose, and maintains covariate balance in randomization, allowing for unbiased comparisons between doses. BARD designs offer an efficient solution to meet the dose optimization requirements set by Project Optimus, with software freely available at www.trialdesign.org.

Indexed as

Maximum Tolerated DoseRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansSample Sizeadaptive designsdose findingDose optimizationProject Optimusseamless designs

Identifiers

PMID40626646
PMCPMC12240483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.