ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Cross-generational plasticity in Atlantic silversides (Menidia menidia) under the combined effects of hypoxia and acidification.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the potential for cross-generational plasticity to influence how offspring respond to hypoxia and ocean acidification (hereafter HypOA) in the coastal forage fish Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia). Mature wild silversides were treated with a control [dissolved oxygen (DO):100% air saturation (a.s.)/PCO2: 650 µatm] or HypOA (DO: 40% a.s./PCO2: 2300 µatm) conditions for 10 days prior to spawning. Their offspring were reared under both treatments in a factorial experimental design. Parental environment had minimal effects on offspring phenotype: exposure to HypOA reduced survival and developmental rates regardless of parental treatment. However, RNAseq analysis revealed that direct offspring exposure to HypOA induced substantial transcriptional changes, with 1606 differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) in larvae from control parents. These changes affected neural development, synaptic signaling, oxygen acquisition and extracellular matrix organization. In contrast, larvae from HypOA-exposed parents exhibited a muted transcriptional response to HypOA, with only four DETs. Although we did not detect a statistically significant interaction between parental and offspring environments at the gene-wise level, a gene set test supported a consistent attenuation of expression changes in offspring from HypOA-treated parents. This pattern may be consistent with transcriptional frontloading, when stress-induced changes are retained, and may modify future responses. However, because this effect did not improve offspring performance under HypOA, they are unlikely to represent an adaptive response. Instead, they may reflect non-adaptive carryover effects of parental exposure. Our findings highlight the potential for cross-generational effects to shape transcriptional plasticity, even in the absence of benefits to offspring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.