ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Neural Mechanisms of Feedback Processing and Regulation Recalibration During Neurofeedback Training.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of neurofeedback-assisted mindfulness for anxiety and nomophobia in Spanish young adults: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- Neural Mechanisms of Feedback Processing and Regulation Recalibration During Neurofeedback Training.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The acquisition of new skills is facilitated by providing individuals with feedback that reflects their performance. This process creates a closed loop that involves feedback processing and regulation recalibration to promote effective training. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based neurofeedback is unique in applying this principle by delivering direct feedback on the self-regulation of brain activity. Understanding how feedback-driven learning occurs requires examining how feedback is evaluated and how regulation adjusts in response to feedback signals. In this pre-registered mega-analysis, we re-analyzed data from eight intermittent fMRI neurofeedback studies (N = 153 individuals) to investigate brain regions where activity and connectivity are linked to feedback processing and regulation recalibration (i.e., regulation after feedback) during training. We harmonized feedback scores presented during training in these studies and computed their linear associations with brain activity and connectivity using parametric general linear model analyses. We observed that, during feedback processing, feedback scores were positively associated with (1) activity in the reward system, dorsal attention network, default mode network, and cerebellum; and with (2) reward system-related connectivity within the salience network. During regulation recalibration, no significant associations were observed between feedback scores and either activity or associative learning-related connectivity. Our results suggest that neurofeedback is processed in the reward system, supporting the theory that reinforcement learning shapes this form of brain training. In addition, the involvement of large-scale networks in feedback processing, continuously transitioning between evaluating external feedback and internally assessing the adopted cognitive state, suggests that higher-level processing is integral to neurofeedback learning, which usually occurs over a short time span. Our findings highlight the pivotal role of performance-related feedback as a driving force in learning, potentially extending beyond neurofeedback training to other feedback-based processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.