Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626582›Full record

Observational studyJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2025

Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Primary Breast Cancer Comparing Interim Shear Wave Elastography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Alessandro Garlaschi, Nicole Brunetti, Simona Tosto, Licia Gristina, Piero Fregatti, Massimo Calabrese, Alberto Stefano Tagliafico

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandro GarlaschiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Nicole BrunettiDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2487-248X
Simona TostoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Licia GristinaDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Piero FregattiDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Massimo CalabreseDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
Alberto Stefano TagliaficoDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1736-0697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is crucial for guiding surgical decisions. This study examined the effectiveness of shear wave elastography (SWE) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the response to NAC in patients with breast lesions.

methodsThis prospective, single-center observational study enrolled 110 patients diagnosed with BC who received NAC from January 2022 to May 2024. All patients underwent breast MRI, US, and SWE both at baseline and after treatment. The treatment response was evaluated using the Miller-Payne (MP) classification, which assigns a score from G1 (no response) to G5 (complete response, absence of malignant cells).

resultsThe results showed that 43.64% (48/110) of patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR), while 56.36% (62/110) had a partial response (NpCR). Tissue stiffness analysis using SWE revealed a significant reduction in stiffness, with an average decrease of 10 kPa in more than 50% of patients. Thresholds of 10, 20, 30, and 50 kPa were evaluated to assess their predictive value for pCR. All thresholds demonstrated statistically significant discriminative power (P < .0001), with AUCs of 0.675 (Se 51.6%, Sp 83.3%), 0.751 (Se 70.97%, Sp 79.17%), 0.749 (Se 79.03%, Sp 70.83%) and 0.677 (Se 85.5%, Sp 50.0%), respectively.

conclusionsThe Shear Wave Elastography  system, which measures tissue stiffness through the speed of shear wave propagation, has proven to be a promising method for monitoring the response to chemotherapy, providing quantitative information that can complement other diagnostic methods such as magnetic resonance.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyUltrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedBreastFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcomebreast cancermagnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant chemotherapypathological complete responseshear wave elastography

Identifiers

PMID40626582
PMCPMC12511825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.