Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626553›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2025

The biological and evolutionary consequences of competition between DNA sequences that benefit the cell and DNA sequences that benefit themselves.

Arnold J Bendich, Scott O Rogers

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arnold J BendichDepartment of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Scott O RogersDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2164-891X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobile genetic elements (e.g. transposons and introns) are genomic parasites, DNA sequences that can proliferate within host genomes. In prokaryotes, these elements are minimized by purifying selection and host-cell defenses. In eukaryotes, however, these parasitic sequences may comprise most of the genome. This extreme imbalance in eukaryotes is maintained by a metabolically quiescent germline through which the genomic parasites are transmitted to the next generation via gametes and spread throughout the population via sexual reproduction. Some eukaryotes avoid the threat posed by genomic parasites by eliminating them from somatic cells, whereas others retain the parasites in somatic cells and attempt to suppress them by epigenetic silencing mechanisms. Here, we review the evidence for the ongoing competition between host and parasite for genome occupancy. We conclude that defenses against mobile genetic elements vary greatly among organisms, and this variation accounts for the enormous range in genome size among organisms.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularInterspersed Repetitive SequencesAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsEpigenesis, GeneticEukaryotaGenomeHumansDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID40626553
PMCPMC12235515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.