ArticleScandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports2025
Lower Extremity Mechanical Energetics During Walking 6 Months Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery of Walking Function After ACL Reconstruction of the Knee Joint: A Non-Randomized Study and Mixed Cross-Sectional Comparison of Postoperative Time Groups.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Lower Extremity Mechanical Energetics During Walking 6 Months Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aberrant gait biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are critical factors contributing to the development of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, it remains unknown how ACLR impacts lower extremity joint energetics and each joint's contribution to total limb energetics during walking. To compare mechanical energetics at the ankle, knee, and hip joints between ACLR limbs, contralateral, and control limbs during walking. Forty-four participants with primary unilateral ACLR (post-ACLR: 6.0 ± 0.2 months) and 44 uninjured controls were studied. Ankle, knee, and hip joint work were calculated as the time integral of the negative (energy dissipation) or positive (energy generation) regions of the respective stance-phase joint power curves. The joint-specific contribution to total limb energy dissipation and generation was calculated. ANCOVA was used to assess differences in energy dissipation and generation at the ankle, knee, and hip between ACLR, contralateral, and matched control limbs, respectively. Compared to contralateral and matched control limbs, ACLR limbs exhibited lesser energy dissipation (ACLR: -0.06 ± 0.03 J/kg; vs. contralateral: -0.12 ± 0.07; vs. control: -0.12 ± 0.04; p < 0.001, all) and generation (0.08 ± 0.03 vs. 0.11 ± 0.06 vs. 0.10 ± 0.04; p < 0.001, all) about the knee joint and lesser contribution from the knee (66.8 ± 33.0 vs. 79.8 ± 26.7 vs. 79.9 ± 23.1; p = 0.01, all) and greater contribution from the hip (30.5 ± 33.1 vs. 14.5 ± 23.5 vs. 14.7 ± 19.8; p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively) to total limb generation during mid-stance. Compared to contralateral limbs and matched controls, individuals at 6 months post ACLR exhibit altered lower extremity mechanical energetics, with decreased knee contributions and a greater hip contribution during walking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.