ArticleJCI insight2025
ADAR1 expression is associated with cervical cancer progression and negatively regulates NK cell activity.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting ADAR1 in Cancer: Biology, Therapeutic Strategies, Challenges, and Limitations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Targeting ADAR1 Restores Interferon Signaling and Enhances Immunotherapy Response in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Two codes of RNA editing by deamination in human diseases.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ADAR1 edits double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) by deaminating adenosines into inosines, preventing aberrant activation of innate immunity by endogenous dsRNAs, which may resemble viral structures. Several tumors exploit ADAR1 to evade immune surveillance; indeed, its deletion reduces tumor viability and reshapes infiltrating leukocytes. Here we investigated the role of ADAR1 in immune evasion mechanisms during cervical cancer (CC) progression. Patients' biopsy samples showed higher ADAR1 expression already in premalignant lesions (squamous intraepithelial lesions [SIL]) and a substantially reduced percentage of infiltrating CD7+ innate cells in in situ and invasive carcinomas compared with normal mucosa, with CD56+ NK cells showing phenotypic alterations that may have affected their functional responses. In CC-derived cell lines (SiHa, CaSki), ADAR1 silencing reduced cell proliferation, an effect further enhanced by exogenous IFN-β administration. It also induced proinflammatory gene expression, as demonstrated by RNA-Seq analysis, and conditioned supernatants collected from these cells activated several NK cell effector functions. NK cell infiltration and activation were also confirmed in organotypic 3D tissue models of SiHa cells knocked out for ADAR1. In conclusion, ADAR1 expression increased with CC progression and was accompanied by alterations in tumor-infiltrating NK cells, but its silencing in CC-derived cell lines potentiated antitumor NK cell activities. Thus, ADAR1 inhibition may represent a therapeutic perspective for CC and possibly other malignancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.