Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626315›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025

Efficacy and Safety of Biologics Targeting Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Shujie Li, Baiyi Yi, Huan Wang, Xianghuai Xu, Li Yu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shujie Li *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Baiyi Yi *Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Huan WangClinical Research Center, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.
Xianghuai XuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8713-5332
Li YuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200065, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4469-4756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation in COPD. Methods: As of September 1, 2024, we identified and screened eight clinical studies evaluating biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation for COPD treatment from multiple databases. Following data extraction, we conducted a network meta-analysis using R software to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety profiles of the five included biologic agents, incorporating visualization of the analytical results. Results: In COPD patients with elevated eosinophil levels (peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥200 cells/μL), dupilumab demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy by: (1) reducing the annualized rate of acute exacerbations (versus placebo: -0.44; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.10), (2) decreasing SGRQ total scores (versus placebo: -3.41; 95% CI -6.00 to -0.82), and (3) increasing pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (versus placebo: 0.06 L; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.12). Benralizumab also showed clinical benefits in reducing acute exacerbation rates (10 mg versus placebo: -0.21; 95% CI -0.39 to -0.04) and improving SGRQ scores (100 mg versus placebo: -1.70; 95% CI -3.35 to -0.04). Furthermore, all five biologic agents evaluated in this network meta-analysis exhibited favorable safety profiles. Conclusion: This NMA demonstrates that both dupilumab and benralizumab show statistically significant efficacy in COPD management, particularly among patients with eosinophilic inflammation. And these biological agents maintain favorable safety profiles. Future research should focus on large-scale multicenter clinical trials, biomarker-based patient stratification, optimization of drug delivery regimens, and development of multi-target combination therapies.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsBiological ProductsInflammationLungPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEosinophilsFemaleHumansRecovery of FunctionTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsbenralizumabBiological ProductsdupilumabbiologicsCOPDnetwork meta-analysistype 2 inflammation

Identifiers

PMID40626315
PMCPMC12232952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.