SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2025
Efficacy and Safety of Biologics Targeting Type 2 Inflammation in COPD: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Inhaled Maintenance Therapy Strategies for Quality of Life in COPD: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Pooled it
- Anti-type 2 monoclonal antibody therapy for eosinophilic COPD beyond triple therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis with strict eosinophil inclusion criteria.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Biologics in Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Dupilumab Versus Mepolizumab for COPD: Evaluating Efficacy Outcomes Using Placebo-Adjusted Indirect Treatment Comparison.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics Screening and Preliminary Experimental Verification of Integrated Stress Response-Associated MYC and BAG3 in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Identification of Immune-Inflammatory Endotypes in Early COPD Risk: A Cluster Analysis of Age-Associated Biomarkers.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- Beyond inhaled medications: precision medicine and biologic therapies targeting the IL-33/TSLP/type 2 axis in COPD.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Beyond pathogens: a narrative review of the immunological nexus of damage-associated molecular patterns and inflammasome activation in sterile AECOPD.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Singapore: Current Perspectives on Prevalence, Disease Burden, and Treatment.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Review
- Real-World Identification of Eosinophilic COPD Patients Potentially Eligible for Dupilumab: A Retrospective Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Observational
- PDE4-Selective Inhibition in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Pulmonary Fibrosis: Different Agents or Different Targets?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation in COPD. Methods: As of September 1, 2024, we identified and screened eight clinical studies evaluating biologic agents targeting type 2 inflammation for COPD treatment from multiple databases. Following data extraction, we conducted a network meta-analysis using R software to indirectly compare the efficacy and safety profiles of the five included biologic agents, incorporating visualization of the analytical results. Results: In COPD patients with elevated eosinophil levels (peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥200 cells/μL), dupilumab demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy by: (1) reducing the annualized rate of acute exacerbations (versus placebo: -0.44; 95% CI -0.77 to -0.10), (2) decreasing SGRQ total scores (versus placebo: -3.41; 95% CI -6.00 to -0.82), and (3) increasing pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (versus placebo: 0.06 L; 95% CI 0.00 to 0.12). Benralizumab also showed clinical benefits in reducing acute exacerbation rates (10 mg versus placebo: -0.21; 95% CI -0.39 to -0.04) and improving SGRQ scores (100 mg versus placebo: -1.70; 95% CI -3.35 to -0.04). Furthermore, all five biologic agents evaluated in this network meta-analysis exhibited favorable safety profiles. Conclusion: This NMA demonstrates that both dupilumab and benralizumab show statistically significant efficacy in COPD management, particularly among patients with eosinophilic inflammation. And these biological agents maintain favorable safety profiles. Future research should focus on large-scale multicenter clinical trials, biomarker-based patient stratification, optimization of drug delivery regimens, and development of multi-target combination therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.