Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626312›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Safety profile and dose-dependent adverse events of upadacitinib in randomized clinical trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Cong Zhang, Zhiwen Fu, Jinmei Liu, Shijun Li, Xu Chen, Yi Zhang, Jiyi Xie

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Updated review of Janus kinase inhibitors for the management of inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastrointestinal pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cong ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhiwen FuDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jinmei LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shijun LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Xu ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yi ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, The First People's Hospital of Jiangxia District, Wuhan, China.
Jiyi XieDepartment of Pharmacy, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Upadacitinib, one of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, has gained global approval for treating various inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, despite the FDA's black box warning on all JAK inhibitors, further research is necessary to verify the potential risks associated specifically with upadacitinib. Therefore, this study conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety profile of upadacitinib and explore potential dose-related differences. Methods: Relevant English publications were identified through a comprehensive search of eligible databases conducted in March 2024 and subsequently updated in May 2025. The inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials that included safety data on upadacitinib. Results: A total of 9,547 patients were involved in this meta-analysis. Upadacitinib treatment was associated with an increased risk of hepatic disorder, neutropenia, acne, herpes zoster, and increased creatine phosphokinase levels. Notably, the risks of hepatic disorder, neutropenia, and acne also exhibited a dose-dependent relationship. However, there was no significant association between upadacitinib treatment and an elevated risk of renal dysfunction, non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC), major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), or venous thromboembolic event (VTE). Conclusion: This study reveals that upadacitinib generally has a favorable safety profile, with increased risks of hepatic disorder, neutropenia, acne, especially at higher doses. There was no significant association with renal dysfunction, NMSC, MACE, or VTE. These findings may serve as an evidence base for potential future modifications or removal of the FDA's black box warning for upadacitinib.

Indexed as

adverse eventsincidence and riskmeta-analysissystematic reviewupadacitinib

Identifiers

PMID40626312
PMCPMC12229998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.