Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626296›Full record

ReviewPediatric discovery2025

Advances in examination methods for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Di Li, Peikang Wang, Man Zhang, Xinkai Zhang, Hailun Yao, Xing Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Di LiChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6006-5593
Peikang WangChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Man ZhangChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1174-3881
Xinkai ZhangChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6306-7803
Hailun YaoChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.
Xing LiuChildren's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Chongqing China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of techniques for evaluating patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). It encompasses the history, clinical examinations, and diagnostic imaging methods for AIS. These methods include digital radiological examination, EOS® imaging, nuclear medicine, ultrasound, body surface topography techniques such as the Moiré pattern technique, raster stereophotography, and DIERS formetric 4D as well as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Traditionally, full-spine standing X-rays have been the standard for diagnosing AIS. High-quality clinical assessments may continue as a reference for assessing other spinal deformities. However, the new diagnostic imaging methods aim to reduce radiation exposure while maintaining image quality and practicality. Emerging technologies demonstrate strong reliability and effectiveness in diagnostic imaging of AlS. These techniques may be beneficial for diagnosing and monitoring AIS and its progression without requiring high levels of radiation exposure. The article is a search and summary of the PubMed electronic database to understand the current and future status of AIS imaging technology, which can not only help to introduce other researchers to the field but also serve as a valuable source for healthcare professionals to study existing methods, develop new ones, or select evaluation strategies.

Indexed as

adolescent idiopathic scoliosisdiagnostic imagingradiological examinationsurface topographyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40626296
PMCPMC12118105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.