ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Assessing Knowledge of Radiation Protection and Safety Among Undergraduate and Intern Radiologic Technologists: A Pre- and Post-Educational Course Survey.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating radiation protection knowledge and practices in operating room personnel: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Radiation protection aims to reduce unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation, protecting patients and healthcare workers. Although diagnostic imaging techniques contribute minimally to overall exposure, risks still exist. Radiologic technologists perform X-ray procedures in diverse settings, collaborating with medical teams to ensure quality patient care. The Radiological Sciences program delivers comprehensive education and clinical training in anatomy, radiation safety, patient positioning, and imaging techniques. This study assesses the effectiveness of educational interventions in enhancing students' understanding of principles of radiation physics, protection, and safety guidelines, preparing them for responsible clinical and research practices. Methods: A cross-sectional, in-person survey was conducted among undergraduate and intern students in the Radiological Sciences Department at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (KSAU-HS) in Jeddah. The Healthcare Professional Knowledge of Radiation Protection (HPKRP) scale was distributed via Google Forms. Data were analyzed using SPSS (v.29). Differences in HPKRP components between students' stages were examined using an unpaired samples Results: Undergraduate students in their third and fourth years, as well as interns who completed post-educational courses, scored significantly higher than second-year students without prior coursework in medical radiation imaging. Participants with post-educational courses and training in ionizing radiation demonstrated the highest knowledge levels in radiation physics, biology, and principles of radiation use (mean: 9.2 ± 0.8), followed by radiation protection (mean: 8.9 ± 1.2). Knowledge of safe ionizing radiation use guidelines scored slightly lower (mean: 8.5 ± 1.6). Conclusion: Structured radiation education significantly enhances students' knowledge of radiation physics, protection, and safety guidelines. Significant improvements were observed between the second and third academic stages, as well as among interns, with stable retention in later stages. Early integration and continuous education for promoting a strong culture of radiation safety and responsible practice across clinical and research environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.