ArticlePediatric discovery2024
The evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship for bacterial meningitis in neonates.
Article in Pediatric discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten-year review of hospital-acquired neonatal meningitis in a tertiary-level NICU: the important role of acinetobacter species.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- The evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship for bacterial meningitis in neonates.Pediatric discovery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial meningitis (BM) is potentially life threatening in neonates, but the duration of antibiotic therapy is not well established. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety among neonates suffering from BM of a relatively shortened duration of antibiotic treatment to the currently recommended course. We did a retrospective cohort study in neonates (gestational age [GA] or corrected GA ≥35 weeks) diagnosed with BM. Neonates in the study group were assigned to withdraw the antibiotics on condition that they were clinically stable after taking sufficient antibiotics with normal serological inflammatory biomarkers, whereas the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indicators remain abnormal. Neonates in the control group were treated until both serological and CSF indicators returned to normal as recommended. The incidence of recurrent infection after the discontinuation of antibiotics and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during hospitalization was measured. A total of 233 neonates were enrolled, of whom 160 were assigned to a shortened antibiotic duration and 73 were treated according to the current guidelines. Twelve patients (7.5%) relapsed in the study group, whereas 4 (5.5%) relapsed in the control group (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.