Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626234›Full record

ArticleMedical devices (Auckland, N.Z.)2025

A Statistical Framework to Detect and Quantify Operator-Learning Curves in Medical Device Safety Evaluation.

Henry C Ssemaganda, Sharon E Davis, Usha S Govindarajulu, Jejo D Koola, Jialin Mao, Dax Marek Westerman, Amy M Perkins, Theodore Speroff, Craig R Ramsay, Art Sedrakyan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Henry C SsemagandaDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.
Sharon E DavisDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Usha S GovindarajuluCenter for Biostatistics, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jejo D KoolaDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jialin MaoDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Dax Marek WestermanDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amy M PerkinsDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Theodore SperoffDepartments of Medicine and Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Craig R RamsayHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Art SedrakyanDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Lucila Ohno-MachadoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale School of Medicine, Haven, CT, USA.
Michael E Matheny *Departments of Biomedical Informatics, Biostatistics, and Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
Frederic S Resnic *Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Comparative Effectiveness Research Institute, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA, USA.

Funding

Incorporating Learning Effects into Medical Device Active Safety Surveillance MethodsR01HL149948 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATHENY, MICHAEL E., RESNIC, FREDERIC S · 2020 to 2023
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL149948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Safety issues leading to patient harm and significant costs have been identified in several post-market medical devices. Recently, powerful learning effects (LE) have been documented in numerous medical devices. Correctly attributing safety signals to learning or device effects allows for appropriate corrective actions and recommendations to improve patient safety. Objective: To develop and assess the statistical performance of an analytic framework to detect the presence of LE and quantify the learning curve (LC). Design and Setting: We generated synthetic datasets based on observed clinical distributions and complex feature correlations among patients hospitalized at US Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Each dataset represents a hypothetical early experience in the use of high-risk medical devices, with a device of interest and a reference device. The study blinded the analysis team to the data-generation process. Methods: We developed predictive models using generalized additive models and estimated LC parameters using the Levenberg-Marqualdt algorithm. We evaluated the performance using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) in detecting the presence of LE and, if present, the goodness-of-fit of the estimated LC based on the root-mean squared error. Results: Among the 2483 simulated datasets, the median (IQR) number of cases was 218,000 (116,000-353,000). LE were detected in 2065 of the 2291 datasets for which learning was specified (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 88%; LR: 7). We adequately estimated the LC in 1632 (81%) of the 2013 datasets in which LE was detected and estimated LC. Discussion: This study demonstrated the framework to be robust in disentangling LE from device safety signals and in estimating LC. Conclusion: In medical device safety evaluation, the operator-learning effects associated with the safety of medical devices can be effectively modeled and characterized. This study warrants subsequent framework validation by using real-world clinical datasets.

Indexed as

generalized additive modelslearning curveLevenberg-Marqualdt algorithmpost-market surveillance

Identifiers

PMID40626234
PMCPMC12230321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.