ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and its components with cardiovascular disease risk: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between adapted dietary index for gut microbiota and carotid intima-media thickness among overweight or obese children and adolescents.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Dietary Patterns Influence Chronic Disease Risk and Health Outcomes in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, and its development and progression are closely associated with diet-induced changes in gut microbiota. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the dietary index for gut microbiota (DI-GM) and its components, including the beneficial gut microbiota score (BGMS) and the unfavorable gut microbiota score (UGMS), in relation to cardiovascular disease. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (1999-2020), collecting baseline sociodemographic and health-related data from 41,193 adults aged ≥20 years. We constructed multivariable weighted logistic regression models to evaluate associations between DI-GM, BGMS, UGMS, and CVD risk, generating weighted restricted cubic spline (RCS) plots to visualize dose-response relationships. Subgroup analyses assessed outcome robustness across sex, age, hypertension, and diabetes subgroups. Results: After adjusting for confounders (age, sex, race, poverty-to-income ratio [PIR index], marital status, and education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index [BMI], and comorbidities), significant associations emerged between DI-GM, BGMS, and CVD risk. Increasing DI-GM and BGMS levels showed gradually decreasing CVD risk trends (DI-GM: OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00, Conclusion: Among adults aged ≥20 years, DI-GM and BGMS showed significant inverse association with CVD risk. Compared to DI-GM, BGMS demonstrates a stronger inverse association with cardiovascular disease risk. These findings underscore the potential crucial role of favorable dietary patterns in cardiovascular disease prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.