Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626198›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2025

Re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as food additive.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF), Laurence Castle, Monica Andreassen, Gabriele Aquilina, Maria Lourdes Bastos, Polly Boon, Biagio Fallico, Reginald FitzGerald, Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp and 37 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Long-term artificial sweetener exposure increases the risk of atherosclerosis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

47 authors.

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
Laurence Castle
Monica Andreassen
Gabriele Aquilina
Maria Lourdes Bastos
Polly Boon
Biagio Fallico
Reginald FitzGerald
Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez
Bettina Grasl-Kraupp
Ursula Gundert-Remy
Rainer Gürtler
Eric Houdeau
Marcin Kurek
Henriqueta Louro
Patricia Morales
Sabina Passamonti
Monika Batke
Ellen Bruzell
James Chipman
Riccardo Crebelli
Cristina Fortes
Peter Fürst
Eric Gaffet
Cheyns Karlien
Thorhallur Halldorsson
Jean-Charles Leblanc
Oliver Lindtner
Katrin Loeschner
Jan Mast
Manuela Mirat
Alicja Mortensen
Anna Undas
Matthew Wright
Stefania Barmaz
Consuelo Civitella
Jose Cortiñas Abrahantes
Pauline Le Gall
Elena Mazzoli
Agnieszka Mech
Josef Daniel Rasinger
Ana Rincon
Francesca Riolo
Camilla Smeraldi
Alexandra Tard
Panagiota Zakidou
Federica Lodi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present opinion deals with the re-evaluation of neotame (E 961) as a food additive. Neotame is the chemically manufactured compound N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-l-α-aspartyl]-l-phenylalanine 1-methyl ester. The main impurity of neotame (E 961) is also a degradation product (de-esterified form), N-[N-(3,3-dimethylbutyl)-l-α-aspartyl]-l-phenylalanine (NC-00751) and the primary metabolite. No new data were received following the call for biological and toxicological data. A summary of the toxicological studies available in the EFSA opinion of 2007 is presented and studies gathered from the literature are summarised. Neotame is rapidly absorbed and pre-systemically metabolised, systemic intact neotame is likely to be excreted in the urine with its metabolites. The potential aneugenic effects at the site of contact are not expected to occur; overall, there is no concern for genotoxicity of neotame (E 961) at the maximum permitted levels or reported use levels. A review of the other endpoints from the already available toxicological database did not indicate an adverse effect for neotame at the highest doses tested. The Panel established an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 10 mg/kg bw per day for neotame based on the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) of 1000 mg/kg bw per day from a 52-week chronic and 104-week carcinogenicity studies in rats. This ADI replaces the ADI of 2 mg/kg bw per day established by EFSA in 2007. The resulting exposure to methanol and its metabolite formaldehyde from the use of neotame at the ADI of 10 mg/kg bw per day does not raise a concern. The dietary exposure estimates of neotame (E 961) for the different population groups of all exposure scenarios did not exceed the ADI. The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for neotame (E 961) at the currently permitted and reported uses and use levels. The Panel recommended the European Commission to consider revising the EU specifications of neotame (E 961).

Indexed as

E961food additiveneotamere‐evaluationsweetener

Identifiers

PMID40626198
PMCPMC12231243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.