ReviewHealth science reports2025
The Effects of Health Information Technology on Quality of Care in Emergency Departments: A Systematic Review.
Review in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The digital divide in adoption and advanced use of electronic health records among US hospitals: rural versus urban disparities from 2008 to 2023.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: To assess the effectiveness on quality of care when leveraging health information technology in the emergency department. Using MeSH terms, secondary data sources from CINAHL, PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and ScienceDirect were queried for the use of health information technology (HIT) in the emergency department and any effects on quality of care. Methods: This systematic review was conducted between June 2020 and January 2021 using the Kruse Protocol. It was reported using the Preferred Reporting items for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Articles were considered eligible for analysis if they were published between January 1, 2016, and January 29, 2021, written in the English language, and if they reported effects of HIT usage on quality in the emergency department setting. No other intervention was utilized. A standardized Excel spreadsheet was used to extract data from 27 articles. A narrative analysis identified themes, which were reported in tables and summarized in affinity matrices. Results: Twenty-seven articles were chosen to review. HIT tools, such as standardized procedures, protocols, checklists, health information exchange, and e-prescribing, were introduced into the ED environment. These resulted in an increase in communication, clinical documentation, improved clinical handoffs, better prediction of falls and readmission, and a decrease in error. Conclusion: HIT implementation in emergency departments can improve workflow, documentation, individualized care, and communication between providers. EHRs can also reduce medical errors at the time of patient care. Quality training for providers in an EHR system may improve overall satisfaction with the implementation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.