ReviewJournal of tissue engineering
Advances in biomaterial-based composite spheroid for articular cartilage regeneration.
Review in Journal of tissue engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Articular cartilage plays a crucial role in reducing friction between bones and enabling movements; however, it is frequently degraded due to persistent joint stress, aging, and osteoarthritis. As its self-repair ability is limited, various cell-based therapeutic strategies have been developed for cartilage regeneration. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures inadequately replicate the complex intercellular interactions of native cartilage. In contrast, three-dimensional (3D) cell spheroid cultures can more accurately mimic in vivo cellular physiology, offering superior regenerative potential via improved cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. These interactions can be enhanced with biomaterials to form composite spheroids, which exhibit substantial potential for improving cartilage regeneration and attenuating osteoarthritis progression in vivo by promoting cell survival and tissue integration. This review highlights current strategies for developing biomimetic composite spheroid systems, including spheroid encapsulation, scaffold incorporation, and 3D bioprinting. Furthermore, we discuss their advantages, translational potential for in vivo cartilage repair, and the challenges and future directions in cartilage tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.