ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Investigation and analysis of the radiation protection status of radiation workers during the peri-pregnancy period.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances and Challenges in Obstetric Intensive Care Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pilot Study on Risk Perception in Practices with Medical Cyclotrons in Radiopharmaceutical Centers in Latin American Countries: Diagnosis and Corrective Measures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Radiation exposure during pregnancy poses serious risks to fetal health, including increased likelihood of miscarriage, preterm birth, congenital anomalies and developmental disorders, while also impacting maternal occupational safety. This study aimed to assess the concerns and needs of radiation practitioners regarding radiation exposure during the perinatal period, with a focus on radiation protection. Methods: A questionnaire survey of 147 radiation practitioners from public and private hospitals was conducted to assess their knowledge, concerns and needs regarding radiation protection during the peri-pregnancy period. Statistical analysis was used to compare the importance and implementation of radiation protection in different groups, and chi-squared tests were used to compare differences in policy implementation (public vs. private hospitals), attitudes toward radiation avoidance (male vs. female practitioners) and concerns about fetal exposure across age groups. Results: Public hospitals demonstrated higher rates of radiation protection policies (39.37%) than private hospitals (21.43%). Among female respondents, 95.12% advocated for temporary removal from radiation-related positions when preparing for pregnancy. Of those who gave birth while working in radiation fields, 26.53% ceased radiation work pre-pregnancy, 30.61% avoided it post-pregnancy and 42.85% did not avoid it. Additionally, 86.58% of female respondents emphasized the need to avoid radiation work during breastfeeding. Among the male participants, 47.83% expressed concern about radiation effects on their fetuses compared with 90% of the female participants. Conclusion: Radiation protection measures were more effectively implemented in public hospitals than in other institutions, underscoring the need for standardized policies across all institutions. Female practitioners exhibited heightened concerns about radiation exposure of the fetus and infant, particularly during pregnancy and lactation. Strengthening policies and workplace adjustments are critical to mitigating occupational risks and safeguarding maternal and child health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.