ReviewFrontiers in robotics and AI2025
A systematic survey: role of deep learning-based image anomaly detection in industrial inspection contexts.
Review in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Multi-Dimensional Vision-Based System for External Thread Defect Detection with Integrated Security Defense.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- PPFS-YOLO: Physics-Prior Frequency-Spatial Fusion for Robust Container Surface Damage Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Study on High-Precision Dimensional Measurement of Irregularly Shaped Carbonitrided 820CrMnTi Components.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence integration and health system performance: effects on diagnostic accuracy, operational efficiency, and workforce outcomes in medical imaging departments.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Industrial automation is rapidly evolving, encompassing tasks from initial assembly to final product quality inspection. Accurate anomaly detection is crucial for ensuring the reliability and robustness of automated systems. The intelligence of an industrial automation system is directly linked to its ability to detect and rectify abnormalities, thereby maintaining optimal performance. To advance intelligent manufacturing, sophisticated methods for high-quality process inspection are indispensable. This paper presents a systematic review of existing deep learning methodologies specifically designed for image anomaly detection in the context of industrial manufacturing. Through a comprehensive comparison, traditional techniques are evaluated against state-of-the-art advancements in deep learning-based anomaly detection methodologies, including supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning methods. Addressing inherent challenges such as real-time processing constraints and imbalanced datasets, this review offers a systematic analysis and mitigation strategies. Additionally, we explore popular anomaly detection datasets for surface defect detection and industrial anomaly detection, along with a critical examination of common evaluation metrics used in image anomaly detection. This review includes an analysis of the performance of current anomaly detection methods on various datasets, elucidating strengths and limitations across different scenarios. Moreover, we delve into the domain of drone-based, manipulator-based and AGV-based anomaly detections using deep learning techniques, highlighting the innovative applications of these methodologies. Lastly, the paper offers scholarly rigor and foresight by addressing emerging challenges and charting a course for future research opportunities, providing valuable insights to researchers in the field of deep learning-based surface defect detection and industrial image anomaly detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.