SynthesisF1000Research2024
Primary health care as the main guarantor of a healthy population in the country and a global challenge in the world: a systematic review.
Synthesis in F1000Research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Competency Profile for Primary Health Care Managers in Chile: Mixed-Methods Validation Through Expert Judgment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary health care (PHC) is a fundamental aspect of healthcare systems globally, playing a crucial role in maintaining the health of the population. Despite its importance, there are still gaps in the delivery of PHC services. This study aims to analyze the healthcare system and the existing gaps to develop strategies for improving PHC services. Methods: This study is a mixed method a combination of documentary analysis and narrative synthesis as an alternative to meta-analysis. For our systematic review, we primarily focused on articles published within the last 10 years. However, we also included some older articles (published between 2003 and 2009) that provided valuable insights into the historical context and evolution of primary healthcare systems. Data of each article reviewed during the review - Study, Article, Study setting, Study design, Study assessment, Study suggestions are presented in Table 1. A total of 38 articles were reviewed. The data sources include peer-reviewed articles and other relevant literature on PHC services. With appropriate keywords. Results: The study identifies gaps in PHC services, including issues with access to care, affordability, and quality of care. It provides insights into the challenges faced by PHC systems worldwide, highlighting the need for strategies to address these issues. Conclusions: The study contributes to a better understanding of the challenges faced by PHC systems worldwide and provides insights for policymakers and healthcare providers to improve healthcare services. The systematic review, which focuses on PHC, was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The PRISMA diagram of study selection was used to illustrate the process of article inclusion and exclusion. Table 1 provides a summary of the key information from the selected articles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.