ArticleJournal of experimental pharmacology2025
Comparison of Essential Oil Extraction Techniques and Their Therapeutic Applications in Dentistry: Focus on
Article in Journal of experimental pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and in vitro Antifungal Evaluation of a Ternary Essential Oil-Based Oral Phytopharmaceutical Formulation AgainstInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, the efficacy of three essential oil extraction techniques steam entrainment, Soxhlet extraction, and supercritical fluid extraction (SCF) was evaluated. Aim: Determine the most effective method for obtaining bioactive compounds from Methodology: The plant species were selected for their therapeutic properties based on scientific reports, certified, and lyophilized before proceeding with the different extraction methods. The efficacy of each technique was compared in terms of the purity and yield of the essential oils obtained. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25. Results: It was shown that FSC extraction is the method that allows obtaining essential oils with the highest purity and yield, followed by steam entrainment, with the Soxhlet method being the least efficient. However, in the microbiological analysis, the essential oil obtained by steam entrainment showed a greater inhibitory effect against Conclusion: In this study, the FSC and steam entrainment techniques are the most suitable for obtaining essential oils for therapeutic applications in dentistry, since they allow better preservation of the bioactive components and reduce the environmental impact. These results position FSC and vapor entrainment extraction as promising options for the development of therapeutic products in dentistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.