Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626074›Full record

ReviewSmart molecules : open access2023

Chemical tags and beyond: Live-cell protein labeling technologies for modern optical imaging.

Dilizhatai Saimi, Zhixing Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Smart molecules : open access, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Thioether editing generally increases the photostability of rhodamine dyes on self-labeling tags.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Experimental Approaches to Visualize Effector Protein Translocation During Host-Pathogen Interactions.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dilizhatai SaimiCollege of Future Technology Institute of Molecular Medicine National Biomedical Imaging Center Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine Peking University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5824-4823
Zhixing ChenCollege of Future Technology Institute of Molecular Medicine National Biomedical Imaging Center Beijing Key Laboratory of Cardiometabolic Molecular Medicine Peking University Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5962-7359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging proteins with high resolution is crucial for studying cellular physiology and pathology. Fluorescence imaging is a privileged method to visualize proteins with subcellular precision in live cells. In recent years, there has been a tremendous advance in the field of fluorescent dyes that are optically more sophisticated than genetically-encodable fluorescent proteins. In this review, we aim to discuss modern bioconjugation methods to specifically incorporate these dyes into protein-of-interests. We focus on advances in live-cell labeling strategies and fluorescent probes, especially the HaloTag, SNAP-tag, TMP-tag, and unnatural amino acid systems and their applications. These protein labeling methods, along with cutting-edge dyes and novel microscopy methods, have become the infrastructure for biological research in the era of super-resolution imaging.

Indexed as

fluorescent dyeslive‐cell imagingprotein labelingself‐labeling tagsunnatural amino acids

Identifiers

PMID40626074
PMCPMC12118198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.