ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Integrating Partner Services and Molecular Epidemiology Data to Enhance HIV Transmission Disruption in Rhode Island.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No Integration Without Preparation: Building Workforce Capacity for Partner Services and HIV Molecular Epidemiology.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluate added value of integrating partner services and molecular epidemiology data to disrupt HIV transmission. Design: Integration of statewide partner services and molecular databases. Methods: We evaluated overlap of persons and their social/molecular links in contact tracing (Contact Tracing Database [CTDB], 2008-2022) and HIV-1 genomic (Genomic Database [GDB], 2004-2023) databases using Jaccard coefficient (JC); inferred molecular clustering using phylogeny; assessed care engagement gaps by developing a "partner naming" cascade; and explored associations of molecular clustering and partner naming using generalized estimating equations. Results: Among 2418 CTDB and 2527 GDB individuals, 894 (JC = 0.22) and 59 links (JC = 0.012) appeared in both databases, demonstrating low overlap. Molecular clustering occurred in 48% of all GDB persons, 65% of persons in both databases, 71% of persons providing partner data, and 88% of named partners in both databases. Of 1342 named partners, contacts were attempted for 66%, and 93% were reached; of those reached, 71% were newly HIV-tested, of whom 27% were newly diagnosed, and all newly diagnosed were sequenced. Men who have sex with men and people who inject drugs were more likely to cluster molecularly in the GDB if linked in the CTDB, while high-risk heterosexuals were less likely. Men who have sex with men and older individuals were more likely to be linked in the CTDB if they clustered molecularly, while people who inject drugs were less likely. Conclusions: Comprehensive, statewide integration of contact tracing and molecular data enables public health insights not available with one source alone, underscoring the added value of data integration in identifying gaps to improve HIV prevention services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.