ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
A feedback-driven ventilation model for assessing airway secretions in mechanically ventilated patients.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: A mechanistic compartmental model with a feedback-driven simulation framework was developed to investigate the impact of airway secretion accumulation and its removal on the respiratory dynamics of mechanically ventilated patients. Understanding these dynamics is essential for secretion management and improving respiratory care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: The model simulates pressure support ventilation by incorporating airway resistances, lung and chest wall compliances, and patient effort via a dynamic respiratory muscle pressure term, enabling realistic modelling of patient-ventilator interaction. To validate the model, simulated waveforms were compared against clinical waveform recordings. Waveform features sensitive to secretion-related changes, as indicated by the model, were then extracted from the patient waveform recordings. The Wasserstein distance metric was used to quantify shifts in pre- and post-suction feature distributions, and unsupervised clustering was applied to identify distinct patient groups corresponding to low, medium, and high secretion levels. Results: The simulations revealed characteristic changes in ventilator waveforms associated with secretion accumulation, including reduced inspiratory flow and prolonged expiration. Analysis of patient data using clustering methods identified distinct groups corresponding to low, medium, and high levels of secretion. Further, we introduce a model-informed secretion index derived from the simulations and patient data, enabling non-invasive and continuous monitoring of secretion accumulation at the bedside. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the potential of physiology-informed, model-based approaches for real-time assessment of secretion accumulation in mechanically ventilated patients. The proposed framework supports personalized respiratory care by providing clinicians with data-driven insights into secretion accumulation, paving the way for more precise secretion management strategies in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.