Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626039›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T-cell therapy for glioblastoma: what can we learn from the early clinical trials? A systematic review.

Justine Tin Nok Chan, James Henley-Waters, Saeed Kayhanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justine Tin Nok ChanFitzwilliam College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2151-8031
James Henley-WatersFitzwilliam College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Saeed KayhanianDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma is a malignant brain tumor with poor outcomes. Chimeric antigen receptor-T (CAR-T)-cell therapy is a possible new intervention in solid tumors using T cells engineered with cancer-specific antigens. This approach is challenged by limited T-cell trafficking to solid tumors, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and glioblastoma-specific uncertainties. Several first-in-human trials have now trialed CAR-T therapy for glioblastoma. We undertake a systematic review of these Phase I trials to draw early lessons about the safety and feasibility of this approach. Methods: Systematic review of all published clinical trials using CAR-T therapy for glioblastoma on July 31, 2024, from 5 databases. Results: Thirteen published studies of Phase I trials of CAR-T therapy for glioblastoma ( Conclusions: Several CAR-T strategies have now been trialed preliminarily for glioblastoma. There appears to be a signal of efficacy, with 56 of 128 reported patients demonstrating at least some measure of response. Central delivery of CAR-T cells appears safe with doses up to 2.5 × 10

Indexed as

CAR-T therapychimeric antigen receptorclinical trialsglioblastomasystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40626039
PMCPMC12232909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.