Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40626031›Full record

ReviewPolish journal of radiology2025

Technical aspects, methodological challenges, and factors predicting outcomes of percutaneous ablation for colorectal liver metastases.

Jakub Franke, Grzegorz Rosiak, Dariusz Konecki, Krzysztof Milczarek, Andrzej Cieszanowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polish journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jakub Franke2 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz Rosiak2 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Dariusz Konecki2 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof Milczarek2 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej Cieszanowski2 Department of Radiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a prevalent malignancy, with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) being a common and challenging clinical issue. Traditionally, surgical resection was the only curative treatment; however, percutaneous ablation (radiofrequency, microwave, and irreversible electroporation) has emerged as a treatment option for select patients. Early trials demonstrated the efficacy of thermal ablation, leading to its inclusion in international guidelines. Currently, for small tumours, it is considered a viable alternative to resection. Recent studies demonstrate the non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared to resection in select cases and emphasize the importance of achieving an adequate ablation margin. Advancements in imaging techniques, ablative modalities, the use of image fusion, as well as ablation confirmation software, allow for a more patient-tailored approach. Additionally, tumour biology, including genetic mutations, influences both overall survival and local control, highlighting the need for personalised treatment strategies. As randomised trials continue to provide more data, the role of ablation in CLM management is evolving. This paper aims to provide a narrative review of factors predicting local control and overall survival in patients treated with ablation. Future research focusing on molecular markers, advanced imaging, and ablation verification techniques may further refine patient selection, and optimise treatment outcomes and follow-up imaging.

Indexed as

colorectal liver metastasisliver ablationmicrowave ablationradiofrequency liver ablation

Identifiers

PMID40626031
PMCPMC12232408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.