ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Molecular markers for the efficacy of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An LSCC-specific R-loop-related model predicts prognosis and neoadjuvant immunotherapy response and identifies EIF5A2-mediated tumor-immune crosstalk.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy and Circulating Biomarkers in Head and Neck Cancer: Advancing Non-Invasive Detection and Tailored Management.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer ranks among the most formidable diseases. Currently, the treatment of malignant tumors has entered the immunotherapy era. Immunotherapy has achieved remarkable progress in treating malignant tumors, including head neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, a significant number of patients exhibit a limited response to this treatment. Thus, the quest for novel molecular biomarkers to assess the efficacy of immunotherapy is of utmost importance. In recent years, the prediction and evaluation of immune efficacy have emerged as focal points of research. Biomarkers developed based on tissue biopsies (such as programmed death ligand-1 expression, tumor infiltrates lymphocyte subsets, tumor mutation burden, cancer-associated fibroblasts, etc.), liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA, circulating tumor cells, and extracellular vesicles, etc.), when combined with nanotechnology, have shown the potential for highly sensitive prediction. This is achieved through non-invasive real-time monitoring of clonal evolution and immune escape. Moreover, radiomics and artificial intelligence (such as deep-learning models) can noninvasively predict and evaluate treatment response and prognosis. In this study, we comprehensively summarize the research progress of molecular markers for predicting and evaluating the efficacy of immunotherapy in head neck squamous cell carcinoma. We approach this from the perspectives of tissue biopsy, liquid biopsy, radiomics, and artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.