ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Part II: consensus statements and expert recommendations for BRCA-associated breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region: clinical management.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Existing guidelines have practical gaps in decision and treatment sequencing for BRCA germline pathogenic variant breast cancers. This paper aims to develop clinical-practice consensus guidelines to address these gaps in the clinical management of BRCA germline pathogenic variants-associated breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. Methods: An expert panel of 16 medical oncologists, geneticists, and breast cancer surgeons from the Asia-Pacific region arrived at 25 statements. The high level of consensus of statements was considered at ≥75%. A survey of 134 healthcare practitioners, breast cancer surgeons, geneticists, oncologists, molecular biologists/pathologists explored the real- world practices in the Asia-Pacific region. Results: A consensus was reached for 80% of the statements (20/25) and aligned with the international guidelines. A significant gap was observed between real-world practices and the recommendations of the steering committee members in discussing contralateral risk reducing mastectomy with the patients as a part of standard practice, considering poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) + immunotherapy for early triple negative breast cancer (eTNBC) patients with BRCA variants who don't achieve pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + immunotherapy, use of adjuvant PARPi in patients with BRCA germline pathogenic variants in eTNBC who have achieved pathological complete response from neoadjuvant therapy, and preference for endocrine therapy + PARPi over endocrine therapy + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) as escalated adjuvant treatment for BRCA pathogenic variants with high-risk hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-negative) early breast cancer. Conclusion: Testing for BRCA germline pathogenic variants should be expanded to include all young patients with breast cancer. Patients with BRCA germline pathogenic variants should undergo genetic testing before surgery as it can impact surgical intervention decisions and further systemic treatment. The use of neoadjuvant platinum agents in chemotherapy increases the pathological complete response rate. Adjuvant PARPi is preferred over CDK4/6i as escalated treatment in patients who are HR+/HER2-negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.