ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025
Revolutions at the frontline of multiple myeloma treatment: lessons and challenges to finding a cure.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering TCR-directed T-cells for the treatment of multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of bone marrow plasma cells. A noteworthy ensemble of therapies has been introduced over the past quarter century that exert antimyeloma activities through diverse mechanisms and achieve durable disease control in many patients. The discovery that proteasome inhibitors (PIs) and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) target specific plasma cell features that reflect disease biology and exert antimyeloma activity led to transformative changes in treatment algorithms. Recently, advances in immunotherapy have emerged and represent a promising option with the potential to capture immunologic memory and yield more durable responses in MM patients. Idecabtagene vicleucel and ciltacabtagene autoleucel are chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapies that attach to the extracellular domain of the B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and have demonstrated significant response rates in heavily-treated patients. These agents are FDA-approved for relapsed and/or refractory (RR)MM patients previously treated with PIs, IMiDs, and CD38-directed monoclonal antibodies. Most patients who receive CAR T-cell therapy relapse after prolonged or brief remission, and a more thorough understanding of the resistance mechanisms following CAR T-cell infusion is needed. Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are engineered to simultaneously bind to both cancer and immune cells and trigger a direct tumor-specific cytotoxic response. BsAbs and CAR T-cells are major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-independent approaches to treat MM and do not require T-cell receptor (TCR) specificity. Agents that target BCMA and G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) demonstrate impressive clinical responses, while early-phase trials targeting FcRH5 are promising. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of their individual efficacy, adverse effects, and limitations that impact broader application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.