Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625992›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

Through a Glass Darkly: Perceptions of Ethnoracial Identity in Artificial Intelligence Generated Medical Vignettes and Images.

Kevlian Andrew, Michael J Montalbano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kevlian AndrewDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, True Blue, St. George's, Grenada.ORCID 0009-0006-5757-631X
Michael J MontalbanoDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, St. George's University, True Blue, St. George's, Grenada.ORCID 0000-0001-8972-2461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Medical education professionals expect artificial intelligence (AI) systems to be an efficient faculty resource for content creation. However, prior findings suggest that machine learning algorithms may exacerbate negative stereotypes and undermine efforts for diversity, equity, and inclusivity. This investigation explores the potential of OpenAI's ChatGPT (OCG) and Microsoft's Bing A.I. Image Creator (MBIC) to perpetuate ethnoracial stereotypes in medical cases. Materials and Methods: A series of medically relevant vignettes and visual representatives were requested from ChatGPT and MBIC for five medical conditions traditionally associated with certain ethnoracial groups: sickle cell anemia, cystic fibrosis, Tay-Sachs disease, beta-thalassemia, and aldehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Initial prompting, self-prompting, and prompt engineering were iteratively performed to ascertain the extent to which AI outputs for generated vignettes and imagery were mutable or fixed. Results: The ethnoracial identity in the vignettes of the clinical conditions adhered more closely than described in epidemiologic studies. Following prompt engineering and self-prompting, an increase in diversity was seen. On initial prompting, the most common ethnoracial identity depicted was Caucasian. Secondary prompting resulted in less diversity with higher conformation to the traditionally expected ethnoracial identity. Conclusion: The prevalence of dataset bias and AI's user-dependent learning abilities underscore the importance of human stewardship. The increasing use of AI in generating medical education content, like MCQs, demands vigilant use of such tools to combat the reinforcement of the race-based stereotypes in medicine.

Indexed as

CurriculumEthnicityMachine learningMedical educationPopulation characteristics

Identifiers

PMID40625992
PMCPMC12228611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.