ArticleMedical science educator2025
An Inter-institutional Peer-Mentoring Program for Professional Development of Medical Educators: Program Components, Evaluation, and Evolution.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous scientific and societal advancements necessitate professional development opportunities for educators to stay current. The diverse backgrounds and needs of medical educators makes one-size-fits-all faculty development programs ineffective. One strategy to overcome this hurdle is to provide personalized development opportunities, including mentoring, coaching, or advising. Here, we describe a peer-mentoring program designed to connect faculty across medical schools to promote personalized professional development. This program enables participants to share ideas, collaborate on teaching or scholarship, problem solve, network, and learn how other institutions function and overcome common hurdles. We propose that this inter-institutional peer-mentoring program could be implemented at other institutions using this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.