ArticleMedical science educator2025
Equity and Longitudinal Assessments: Perspectives from Physician Assistants/Associates (PAs) Participating in PANRE-LA.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors associated with PAs' choice of the traditional PANRE over the PANRE-LA.JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Longitudinal assessments (LAs) may offer more flexibility and unique opportunities to enhance equity. Although prior findings on LAs demonstrate that they foster learning, limited research exists on potential differences in examinee perspectives by demographics and practice characteristics. Addressing this research gap is vital to ensuring that examinees from different backgrounds equally derive learning benefits from LAs. Methods: We evaluated potential differences in perspectives and experiences of physician assistants/associates (PAs) participating in the PA National Recertifying Examination Longitudinal Assessment (PANRE-LA) program, considering a wide range of demographic and practice characteristics. Results: Over 90% agreed that this type of assessment provides a learning experience, helps to identify gaps, provides an opportunity to improve, aligns with a lifelong learning perspective, and keeps core medical knowledge up-to-date. Approximately 84% believed it helps them to be a better practitioner, and 78.7% either anticipated or had applied learning from PANRE-LA to their clinical practice. Discussion: Our findings suggest that PAs across diverse demographics and practice characteristics equally derive self-reported learning benefits from PANRE-LA. LAs, due to their formative components, may provide unique opportunities to promote equity in knowledge acquisition, foster continuous learning, and ultimately contribute to improved patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.