ArticleMedical science educator2025
Qualitative Phenomenological Exploration of Perspective of Medical Students Regarding Integrated Modular System.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recently, the integrated modular system (IMS) of medical education has been implemented in Pakistan. Being a newly introduced system, issues can arise during the adaptation phase which can be resolved by taking the views of students about the Integrated Modular System on board. Thus, effectiveness and underlying challenges can be unveiled. Objective: This study aims to investigate the perspectives of medical students of Aziz Fatimah Medical and Dental College regarding benefits and challenges of IMS. Methodology: After ethical approval, this qualitative study was conducted in Aziz Fatimah Medical and Dental College, during June 2024 to August 2024. Non-probability purposive sampling was used and data was collected through semi-structured interviews via Zoom until saturation was reached. A total of 20 students were interviewed via Zoom after getting a written consent. After recording and transcription, a reflexive thematic analysis was carried out via NVIVO software to make themes and codes, which were re-evaluated afterward to finalize the results. The study was done as per Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative research (COREQ). Results: Two themes, i.e., benefits and challenges were derived from the data. Students appreciated that the modular system provides holistic learning and integration, clinical preparedness, exam efficiency and adaptability, global medical education compatibility, enhanced learning strategies, and a less stressful and more engaging curriculum. However, time constraints and syllabus challenges, struggle with minor subjects, deficient clinical engagement, transition issues with the new system, and high stress and intensive efforts were problematic for the students. Conclusion: IMS has thus been accepted by students owing to its advanced learning strategies. However, clinical ward classes and time management workshops should be arranged to enhance the impact of IMS. This study sheds light on how IMS can be optimized along with opening doors for further research on problems of IMS implementation in Pakistan. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02364-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.