Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625952›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

"

Anita Truong, Rishi Durupala, Cheryl Goldstein, Victor Do

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anita TruongUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-2101-8917
Rishi DurupalaUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Cheryl GoldsteinOffice of Advocacy and Wellbeing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Victor DoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Despite frequent reference to "culture change" in discussions surrounding well-being in medical education, little work has been done to elucidate how medical students conceptualize culture in medicine, how they believe this impacts well-being, and their perspectives on the concept of culture change. This study aimed to gain a deeper understanding of how clerkship medical students conceptualize culture in medicine and determine what influences and shapes this perception. Methods: Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 clerkship students attending three different Canadian medical schools via Zoom. The interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: We identified several major themes. Medical culture is partly shaped by how learners perceive and attempt to navigate the learning environment. Students report experiencing significant effects of medical hierarchy and power structures during their education and that students feel the learning environment is highly competitive which leads to the need for impression management. Participants noted adapting to this culture required one to not internalize and instead reframe negative experiences. Conclusion: Our in-depth exploration of how clerkship students conceptualized and perceived the culture of medicine revealed that learners view many opportunities to optimize the culture in medicine. These findings provide important insight and tangible opportunities for improvement.

Indexed as

CultureExpectationsHierarchyLearnersMedicine

Identifiers

PMID40625952
PMCPMC12228873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.