ArticleMedical science educator2025
Exploring Students' Use of Medical Education Resources for the USMLE Step 2 CK Exam Preparation.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Institute-created electronic flashcards, associated development effort, and exam performance in pharmacology education in human medicine.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE®) Step 1 to pass/fail has increased the perceived importance of Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) scores, making effective exam preparation increasingly important. Our study characterizes Step 2 CK resource usage patterns and analyzes their relationship with scores. Methods: Data from an anonymous, retrospective survey of fourth-year medical students from the Mercer University School of Medicine (MUSM) and the University of Alabama at Birmingham Marnix E. Heersink School of Medicine (HSOM) were analyzed to assess their study resource utilization patterns and self-reported Step 2 CK scores. Results: A total of 275 students reported average usage of 4.4 resources, including 1.6 question banks (Qbanks), 1.2 video, 0.6 podcast, 0.5 flashcard, and 0.6 print resources. All but one used Qbanks; all used digital resources, while 42.1% also used print resources. The mean Step 2 CK score of 247.3 (SD = 12.8) mirrored national averages. Total resources used did not impact scores significantly. Using 3 + Qbanks was significantly associated with lower scores. Video usage corresponded to lower scores. Students using no print resources scored significantly higher. Podcast and flashcard usage had no significant associations. The most popular resources were UWorld (97.7%), Anki (50.3%), Divine Intervention (50.3%), and AMBOSS (49.7%). Conclusion: Medical students accessed diverse resources for Step 2 CK preparation but focused on commercial question banks most frequently and print materials minimally. Students should avoid resource overload and emphasize active learning with 1-2 Qbanks and use other materials judiciously, building upon past course work to enhance Step 2 CK scores. Ongoing monitoring of study resource usage can guide a school's academic coaching, curricular decisions, and resource acquisition. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02362-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.