ArticleMedical science educator2025
Unraveling "Feeling Bad" in a Non-Western Culture: Achievement Emotions in Japanese Medical Students.
Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reduced Test Anxiety Among Medical Students in an Extremely Low-Stakes Examination.Medical science educator · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Medical Emotion Scale has been translated into Japanese (J-MES) and validated for cross-cultural emotion research in medical education. However, its applicability for extracting Japanese cultural aspects of medical students' emotions has not been examined. This study aimed to explore the underlying latent constructs related to culture in the J-MES by conducting factor analyses. Methods: In total, 41 medical students enrolled at a Japanese university participated in this study. The students completed the J-MES before, during, and after a computer-based clinical reasoning activity. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale. Factor extraction was based on a scree plot investigation. Results: The EFA for emotions before the task pointed to a four-factor structure explaining 56.70% of the total variance. The first factor accounted for 26.44% of the variance. Based on the seven items with the highest loadings on this factor (e.g., happiness), we interpreted the first factor as representing a positive valence dimension. The second factor explained 13.78% of the variance with four items of highest loadings (e.g., anger), which was interpreted as representing negative emotions toward the learning activity. The third factor explained 10.48% of the variance with three items (e.g., shame), interpreted as negative emotions related to self-performance. The fourth factor explained 6.00% of the variance with three items (e.g., confusion), which was interpreted as representing anxiety-related emotions. Discussion: Negative emotions included multiple factors such as learning activity- and self-performance-related emotions, which could be associated with Japan's interdependent culture. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-025-02296-w.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.