Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625847›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2025

Awareness of DCD from the perspective of stakeholders in the Dutch school system: a qualitative study.

Femke van Abswoude, Meike Bakker, Linda Hanegraaf, Hidde Bekhuis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Femke van AbswoudeBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Meike BakkerBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Linda HanegraafBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Hidde BekhuisBehavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is one of the most prevalent developmental disorders, but largely unknown by educational professionals. The overall aim of this study was to explore awareness of DCD and ways to improve this among stakeholders in the Dutch primary school system. Methods: One semi-structured interviews were performed with teachers (including classroom teachers ( Results: Overall, 28.6% of the participants were aware of DCD, with percentages varying largely between participants from the school organization (100%), college students (14.3%), and teachers (10%). All participants endorsed the importance of raising awareness of DCD within the school system. It was recognized that participants can provide social support for children with DCD by stimulating both personal and social resources. All participants were open to ways to improve awareness, the responsibility of which is mostly ascribed to special need coordinators within schools. Discussion and conclusion: The results highlight both the lack of awareness of DCD among stakeholders in the primary school system in the Netherlands, as well as the importance of changing this. When teachers are aware of DCD, they can provide social support to the child which is essential to diminish the possible physical and psychological consequences. Increasing awareness within the Dutch school system may lead to better understanding, earlier diagnosis and earlier interventions for children with DCD.

Indexed as

awarenessdevelopmental coordination disorderinterviewsstudentssupportteachers

Identifiers

PMID40625847
PMCPMC12230003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.