ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025
RCT of post-conflict trauma interventions in the Central African Republic.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates mental health treatment in a post-conflict setting with scant mental health resources. The study reports on a randomized crossover control group design with one intervention and two control groups implemented in the Central African Republic (CAR). The intervention's impact on symptoms of depression, anxiety and trauma was analyzed among a sample of 298 participants located in the capital city, Bangui. Participants were screened for elevated levels of anxiety and depression and randomly assigned to one of three groups: control, intervention and active control. Data included an initial interview, measurement following the two intervention workshops and a 3-month post-intervention follow-up. The trauma reduction intervention significantly reduced symptoms of depression, anxiety and trauma compared to the waitlist control. The active control group focused on peace and value education and produced equivalent outcomes to the trauma-reduction intervention group. Further, at 3 months follow-up, the impact of both interventions remained significant, although lower. The two interventions did not differ from one another. The study demonstrates two practical approaches for addressing anxiety, depression and trauma symptoms in post-conflict, low-resource settings. The similar outcome of the two interventions may suggest that they share common therapeutic elements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.