Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625805›Full record

ReviewSmart molecules : open access2024

Positional functionalizations of metal-organic frameworks through invasive ligand exchange and additory MOF-on-MOF strategies: A review.

Daeyeon Lee, Sangho Lee, Isaac Choi, Min Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Smart molecules : open access, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cellulosic Composites in Lithium Metal Batteries.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A NiNature communications · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daeyeon LeeDepartment of Chemistry Chungbuk National University Cheongju Republic of Korea.
Sangho LeeDepartment of Chemistry Chungbuk National University Cheongju Republic of Korea.
Isaac ChoiDepartment of Chemistry Chungbuk National University Cheongju Republic of Korea.
Min KimDepartment of Chemistry Chungbuk National University Cheongju Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-2682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) represent a unique class of porous materials with tremendous potential for diverse applications. A key factor contributing to their versatility is their ability to precisely introduce functional groups at specific positions within pores and crystals. This review explores two prominent strategies for achieving the positional functionalization of MOFs: post-synthetic ligand exchange (PSE) and MOF-on-MOF. In PSE, the existing ligands within solid-state MOFs can be selectively replaced by the desired functional groups in solution through ligand dynamics. This invasive functionalization provides a flexible approach to fine-tuning the surface of the MOFs with the target functionality. Conversely, MOF-on-MOF strategies are additive methodologies involving the controlled growth of one MOF layer onto another. The functionality of the core and shell (or surface) can be independently controlled. This review critically examines the examples, strengths, limitations, and applications of these strategies, emphasizing their significance in advancing the field of MOF functionalization and paving the way for tailored multifunctional materials with precise and specific properties.

Indexed as

metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)MOF‐on‐MOF multifunctional materialsporous coordination polymers (PCPs)post‐synthetic exchanges (PSEs)

Identifiers

PMID40625805
PMCPMC12118279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.