Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625778›Full record

ReviewGHM open2025

A scoping review on mindfulness-based interventions for families of patients with advanced cancer.

Junko Morishita, Yuka Takita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GHM open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junko MorishitaNational Nursing College, Japan, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuka TakitaDepartment of Nursing, Teikyo University Faculty of Medical Technology, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to conduct a scoping review to investigate mindfulness-based interventions targeting the families of patients with advanced cancer to elucidate the characteristics of the target population, program content, and evaluation methods. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, and relevant studies were identified through searches in the PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases. A total of 13 studies were included, with only one focusing solely on family members, while the rest involved both family members and patients. Among the 13 studies, 4 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 10 were pilot studies. The sample sizes varied, with seven studies involving single-group designs, four using two-group designs, one with a three-group design, and one study where no information on group size was provided. The framework and content of the programs were adapted from existing mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques to suit the target context and were evaluated using multiple measures, including assessments of anxiety and depression. Most studies recruited families and patients together, and programs targeting families alone were underdeveloped. Future studies should address the needs and challenges faced by the families of patients with advanced cancer, refining program content and evaluation methods from the perspective of nurses.

Indexed as

caregiverfamily nursingintervention programmeditationmental health

Identifiers

PMID40625778
PMCPMC12231351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.