ReviewGHM open2025
A scoping review on mindfulness-based interventions for families of patients with advanced cancer.
Review in GHM open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to conduct a scoping review to investigate mindfulness-based interventions targeting the families of patients with advanced cancer to elucidate the characteristics of the target population, program content, and evaluation methods. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, and relevant studies were identified through searches in the PubMed, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases. A total of 13 studies were included, with only one focusing solely on family members, while the rest involved both family members and patients. Among the 13 studies, 4 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and 10 were pilot studies. The sample sizes varied, with seven studies involving single-group designs, four using two-group designs, one with a three-group design, and one study where no information on group size was provided. The framework and content of the programs were adapted from existing mindfulness-based stress reduction techniques to suit the target context and were evaluated using multiple measures, including assessments of anxiety and depression. Most studies recruited families and patients together, and programs targeting families alone were underdeveloped. Future studies should address the needs and challenges faced by the families of patients with advanced cancer, refining program content and evaluation methods from the perspective of nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.