ArticleGHM open2025
Paraganglioma of the spermatic cord: A rare tumor with unique imaging findings and diagnostic challenges.
Article in GHM open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas are rare endocrine neoplasms derived from neural crest cells, with spermatic cord paragangliomas being exceptionally uncommon. A 42-year-old man presented with a longstanding complaint of left scrotal enlargement. Initial imaging raised suspicion of testicular carcinoma, but contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a well-circumscribed, hypervascular mass distinct from the testis. The tumor exhibited heterogeneous T2 signal intensity, characteristic of vascular lesions, a thick capsule, and early-phase peripheral contrast enhancement with delayed homogeneous filling. A solitary fibrous tumor was initially considered as a differential diagnosis. Surgical resection confirmed the tumor's origin in the spermatic cord. Histopathology revealed small, round neoplastic cells with a delicate sinusoidal vascular network, and immunohistochemical analysis was positive for chromogranin A and synaptophysin, confirming the diagnosis of paraganglioma, with its origin traced to the spermatic cord. The surgical margins were clear, and postoperative imaging showed no metastases. At 18 months follow-up, no recurrence was detected, and biochemical markers remained normal. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of spermatic cord paragangliomas due to their rarity and imaging resemblance to other intra-scrotal neoplasms. Although preoperative diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management, almost all of the reported cases of spermatic cord paragangliomas have been diagnosed postoperatively. New imaging techniques, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.