Trial reportFrontiers in immunology2025
Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib versus sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Trial report in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Open-label，Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Sintilimab and IBI305 Compared to Sorafenib in the First-Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. （ORIENT-32）
A Phase 2 Study to Investigate the Preliminary Antitumor Activity, Safety and Tolerability of Tislelizumab in Combination With Lenvatinib in Patients With Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TACE combined with tislelizumab and lenvatinib in the treatment of intermediate-to-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective real-world study.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- The SAGES scoring model leads to personalized treatment via the combination of TACE, TKIs and ICIs for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Durable Control of Multi-Refractory HBV-HCC with Bevacizumab/Sintilimab/Lenvatinib Triplet Therapy.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors plus bevacizumab (or biosimilars) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been widely used for the first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, no head-to-head trials have compared the efficacy outcomes between these two combination regimens. Therefore, an unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib versus sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar. Methods: Individual patients from the BGB-A317-211 study (NCT04401800) for tislelizumab plus lenvatinib were adjusted to match the population from the ORIENT-32 (NCT03794440) for sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar through an unanchored MAIC. Odds Ratios (ORs) of objective response rates (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR), and hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated to quantify the relative treatment effect between the two treatment regimens after population matching. Sensitivity analyses were performed by sequentially removing one variable in the matching and adjusting the population through simulated treatment comparison (STC). Results: After matching, baseline characteristics were balanced between the tislelizumab plus lenvatinib group (effective sample size [ESS] = 49, ESS/N = 79.03%) and sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar group (N = 380). MAIC analysis indicated that tislelizumab plus lenvatinib group showed significantly higher ORR per RECIST v1.1 (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.40-4.63; Conclusions: This MAIC analysis demonstrated that tislelizumab plus lenvatinib achieved superior efficacy, with higher ORR and longer PFS and OS compared to sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar in untreated Chinese patients with uHCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.