Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625732›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

The battle between bacterial infection and autophagy in aquatic animals.

Qi Wang, He Xu, Jiaxue Jin, Yankai Yang, Lothar Jänsch, Senlin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Mechanisms ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qi WangSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
He XuSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jiaxue JinSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yankai YangSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lothar JänschCellular Proteomics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Senlin LiSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a conserved cellular degradative pathway that has been demonstrated to play a crucial role in the innate immune response to combat infection with a range of pathogenic bacteria via xenophagy. Although this process has been well-described in terrestrial animals, the extent to which autophagy contributes to aquatic animal-bacteria interactions remains poorly understood. Autophagy can directly eliminate intracellular pathogens by acting as a conduit for their lysosomes delivery. Consequently, bacteria have evolved a variety of tactics to evade autophagy. This is accomplished by interfering with autophagy signaling or the autophagy machinery itself. In certain instances, bacteria even utilize autophagy as a means of promoting their growth. This review discusses canonical and non-canonical autophagy pathways and current knowledge of autophagy in aquatic animals. This review illuminates the intricate relationship between autophagy components and intracellular bacteria. It explores how the autophagic machinery senses these bacteria directly or indirectly, the interaction between autophagy and effectors/toxins secreted by bacteria, and how some of these bacterial pathogens evade autophagy.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsAutophagyBacteriaBacterial InfectionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsImmunity, InnateSignal Transductionautophagybacteriaimmunologyteleostxenophagy

Identifiers

PMID40625732
PMCPMC12229856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.