Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625708›Full record

ArticleIndustrial & engineering chemistry research2025

An End-of-Life Plastic and Additive Flow Tracker Tool for Scenario Forecasting.

John D Chea, Matthew Conway, Gerardo J Ruiz-Mercado, Kirti M Yenkie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John D CheaOffice of Research & Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8052-6509
Matthew ConwayDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering, Rowan University Glassboro, New Jersey, 08028, United States.
Gerardo J Ruiz-MercadoOffice of Research & Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5313-5094
Kirti M YenkieDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Henry M. Rowan College of Engineering, Rowan University Glassboro, New Jersey, 08028, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8044-0369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastics are widely used for their affordability and versatility in various applications. However, the end-of-life (EoL) management stage can often lead to the release of hazardous chemical additives and degradation products into the environment, which leads to ecological and human exposure risks. The increasing demand for plastics is expected to escalate the frequency of material releases during plastic EoL management activities, creating a challenge for policymakers, consumers, manufacturers, and communities to ensure proper material segregation, reuse, recycling, and disposal. Effective management is crucial for achieving a safer and sustainable circular economy (CE) for plastics, enhancing recycling efficiency and promoting material reuse. End-of-life plastic research efforts often overlook chemical additives, which are crucial for understanding the environmental and health implications of plastic usage. Therefore, chemical additive content and release must be assessed and considered when designing and implementing technologies, supply chains, incentives, and regulations for plastic CE management solutions. This research offers a Python-based EoL plastic and additive flow tracker tool (EoLPAFT) to support decision-makers in analyzing the holistic impacts and benefits of potential plastic EoL management solutions, considering the chemical additives within EoL plastics, their releases, and occupational exposure scenarios. The utility of the tool was tested through two hypothetical case scenarios, including (1) nationwide adoption of an extended producer responsibility (EPR) program and (2) maintaining a CE for plastic. The analyses projected by the tool can ease the prediction of long-term outcomes, offering technical knowledge and insight for policymakers and stakeholders seeking to minimize the environmental, social, economic, and health impacts of plastic pollution while seeking a safer and more sustainable CE of plastics considering chemical additives.

Identifiers

PMID40625708
PMCPMC12232299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.