ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Genomic epidemiology of
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ovine epididymitis - a neglected notifiable disease in Germany: a case report.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Genomic outbreak investigation of biosafety-level-3 pathogens using nanopore sequencing.Microbial genomics · 2026Article
- Risk assessment for Brucella suis biovar 2 in Danish pigs.Porcine health management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Porcine brucellosis, caused by Methods: A comprehensive study was conducted on German Results: Three different MLST sequence types were identified and further subdivided into eight clusters. This approach conclusively confirmed officially reported primary and secondary outbreaks caused by the sale of infected animals. In individual cases, remarkable similarities were found between domestic and wild animal isolates, that is, differing by only 2-4 nucleotides. This similarity suggests brucellosis transmission events. Both wild boars and hares can be considered reservoirs of Discussion: As most brucellosis outbreaks occurred in outdoor holdings, reliable monitoring of these herds is recommended, although the exposure of these animals to external factors (e.g., vectors) poses a challenge. However, it is imperative in light of the increase in organic free-range and pasture farming, which promotes direct or indirect contact with wild animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.