Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625693›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Midwifery care attachments: shaping childbirth agency through care techniques.

Annekatrin Skeide

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Annekatrin SkeideInstitute for Midwifery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Midwifery care has been shown to effectively enhance birth outcomes and improve childbirth experiences. It has, however, not yet been sufficiently articulated how exactly. This study explores how trustful and empowering relationships are crafted through midwifery birthing care techniques. To do so, it builds on insights derived from feminist science and technology studies' engagements with caring in terms of empirical ethics, namely as situated practices of "doing good". Using reflexive thematic analysis, I examine semi-structured interviews with midwives alongside ethnographic fieldwork conducted across various midwifery care settings in Germany. Setting two birthing stories in dialogue, I illustrate how bodies-in-labor emerge through collective, active, persistent and adaptive engagements with these dynamic entities in midwifery practice to make physiological childbirth happen. Specifically, I argue that through the midwifery care techniques of "spooning" and "labor and birth positioning" midwifery birthing care attachments are fostered. I conceptualize these attachments as co-responsive, active-passive commitments aimed at sustaining endurable or even pleasurable relationships between embodied selves and bodies-in-labor. Investigating situated midwifery care techniques enables a detailed understanding of their specific qualities in particular childbirth situations, extending conventional notions of being-with and non-intervention. This approach allows to articulate, critically engage with, and strengthen midwifery-specific childbirth care practices.

Indexed as

autonomybodycarechildbirthlabormidwiferyobstetric violencetechniques

Identifiers

PMID40625693
PMCPMC12230045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.