ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Machine learning algorithms as early diagnostic tools for prolonged operative time in patients with fluorescent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for predicting surgical difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative and perioperative predictors of prolonged hospital stay after uncomplicated elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Towards measuring the challenge: a narrative review on existing concepts and parallels for surgical struggle.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors for prolonging the operative time of fluorescence laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In addition, we aimed to construct predictive models to identify patients with potentially prolonged operative times (OT) using machine learning (Ml) methods. Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent fluorescent LC for gallbladder stones in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery at our hospital from April 2023 to July 2024 were retrospectively analyzed, with the 75th percentile of operative time as the cut-off point. Parameters screened by univariate and multifactor analysis and LASSO regression were incorporated into the model, and the optimal model was analyzed and determined by integrating 11 Ml classification models. Results: The 85 min or more was defined as prolonged OT, and 29% (223/726) of patients had prolonged OT. The variables screened by univariate, multivariate analysis and lasso regression included type of cholecystitis, number of puncture ports, gallbladder adhesion, conservative antibiotic treatment before surgery, gallbladder thickness (mm). The above five parameters were incorporated into the Ml model. Comprehensive analysis revealed that the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) classification model was the optimal model, with the area under the curve (AUC) of the validation cohort was 0.876, the 95% confidence interval was 0.8139-0.938, the accuracy was 0.843, the sensitivity was 0.805, and the specificity was 0.857, with AUC of validation cohort was 0.876. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the actual and predicted probabilities of the LightGBM classification model; The decision curve analysis showed that the model had good net clinical benefit in most of the threshold probability range. Conclusions: We created a nomogram for assessing the risk of prolonged fluorescent LC time using the LightGBM classification model, which may help surgeon identify patients whose OT may be prolonged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.