Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40625673›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025

The forgotten spine score: study protocol for a novel patient-centered outcome measure in lumbar spine fusion surgery.

Luca Ambrosio, Jordy Schol, Yuto Otani, Giorgia Petrucci, Elisabetta de Rinaldis, Shota Tamagawa, Fabrizio Russo, Rocco Papalia, Daisuke Sakai, Gianluca Vadalà and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Luca Ambrosio *Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Jordy Schol *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Yuto OtaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Giorgia PetrucciOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Elisabetta de RinaldisResearch Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus, Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Shota TamagawaDepartment of Medicine for Orthopaedics and Motor Organ, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Fabrizio RussoOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Rocco PapaliaOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Daisuke SakaiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Gianluca VadalàOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo DenaroOperative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lumbar spine fusion (LSF) surgeries have increased due to the rising prevalence of degenerative spine disorders and advancements in surgical techniques. However, the success of these procedures should be evaluated from the patient's perspective, emphasizing the need for effective patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Existing PROMs often focus on symptoms and lack specific validation for surgical patients undergoing LSF. Inspired by the Forgotten Joint Score used in joint replacement surgery, here we introduce the Forgotten Spine Score (FSS), a new patient-centered PROM designed to assess the extent to which patients "forget" about the operated spinal segment(s) in their daily lives. This study protocol outlines our approach to develop and validate the FSS as a reliable tool for evaluating outcomes in LSF patients, focusing on their perception of surgery's impact on daily life and well-being. This multi-institutional cross-sectional study will involve a pilot phase to refine the newly designed 18-item FSS survey in Italian and Japanese, followed by a validation phase to assess the adjusted survey in the respective populations. Eligible participants will include adults who have undergone LSF for degenerative disorders at varying follow-up times. The FSS will be administered alongside the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Statistical analyses will assess internal consistency, reliability and validity, with significance set at

Indexed as

disabilitydisc degenerationlow back painlumbar spinepatient-reported outcome measuresspinal fusionspine surgery

Identifiers

PMID40625673
PMCPMC12231350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.