ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2025
Memristor-Based Artificial Neural Networks for Hardware Neuromorphic Computing.
Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis and Applications of Neuromorphic Memristors in Artificial Intelligence Computing.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Toward therapnostic integration as a new paradigm for precision management of interstitial cystitis driven by medical-engineering convergence.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Intrinsic gradient oxygen-driven second-order memristors for continual reinforcement learning.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Biomimetic Synapses Based on Halide Perovskites for Neuromorphic Vision Computing: Materials, Devices, and Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Bridging neuromorphic computing and deep learning for next-generation neural data interpretation.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial neural networks have long been studied to emulate the cognitive capabilities of the human brain for artificial intelligence (AI) computing. However, as computational demands intensify, conventional hardware based on transistor and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technology faces substantial limitations due to the separation of memory and processing, a challenge commonly known as the von Neumann bottleneck. In this review, we examine how memristors, which are novel nonvolatile memory devices that exhibit memory-dependent resistance, can be harnessed to build more efficient and scalable neural networks. We provide a comprehensive background on the evolution of neural network models and memristors, as well as introduce the principles of memristive devices, which mimic the dynamic behavior of biological synapses. Various neural network architectures, including convolutional, recurrent, and spiking models, are discussed, highlighting the advantages of integrating memristors for in-memory computing and parallel processing. Our review further examines key mechanisms such as synaptic plasticity, encompassing both long-term potentiation and depression, as well as emerging learning algorithms that leverage memristive behavior. Finally, we identify current challenges, such as achieving ultra-low power consumption, high device uniformity, and seamless system integration, and propose future directions in materials science, device engineering, system integration, and industrialization. These advances suggest that memristor-based neural networks may pave the way for next-generation AI systems that combine low power consumption with high computational performance, ultimately bridging the gap between biological and electronic information processing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.