ReviewGastroenterology report2025
Tricky acute mesenteric ischemia: what can we do?
Review in Gastroenterology report, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing precision triage in strangulated small bowel obstruction: from static scores to dynamic multiparametric models.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a life-threatening vascular disorder that demands greater clinical and research attention due to its significant morbidity and mortality risks. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for AMI in patients presenting with severe abdominal pain disproportionate to physical findings, particularly those with atrial fibrillation or recent vasoconstrictor use. In such cases, prompt computed tomography angiography is recommended as the initial diagnostic modality, given its high sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and favorable safety profile. Multi-disciplinary treatment plays a critical role in elucidating disease etiology and guiding therapeutic decision-making. For confirmed cases of intestinal necrosis, open surgical intervention remains the gold standard. Laparoscopic exploration offers a minimally invasive alternative for assessing bowel viability while reducing unnecessary surgical trauma in equivocal presentations. In the pre-necrotic phase of intestinal ischemia, emerging endovascular therapies demonstrate increasing promise due to their minimally invasive nature and improved clinical outcomes, warranting further investigation. Continuous clinical vigilance is essential throughout management. Persistent abdominal pain or signs of peritonitis may indicate disease progression, necessitating urgent reassessment for possible ischemic necrosis and therapeutic strategy adjustments. This review synthesizes current evidence by examining AMI pathophysiology, anatomical considerations, risk factors, and diagnostic-therapeutic advancements, with an emphasis on optimizing clinical decision-making in this critical condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.